Wacky Wednesday

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
133
Reaction score
71
51-38
2× are 17-15

2X Play — St. Bonaventure vs La Salle Under 145.5


I’m playing the under here at 145.5. The matchup profile, recent results, and the way St. Bonaventure plays all point toward a game that should land several points below this number.

The market gave the first clue. The total opened around 145.5 and quickly moved down to 144.5 with some heavier juice showing on the under along the way. That type of move usually means respected money hit the under early. Even after the adjustment, betting splits still show slightly more money on the under than the over, suggesting the larger wagers are still leaning that direction.

Looking at recent games for St. Bonaventure also shows how much their pace can affect scoring. Their last five results were 94–76 against Rhode Island, 94–99 at Richmond, 58–71 at George Mason, 63–68 against Davidson, and 82–91 in overtime at George Washington. While a couple of those games turned into shootouts, the slower ones landed at totals of 129 and 131. That’s the type of tempo profile you often see when St. Bonaventure controls the game.

There are three main reasons their games tend to suppress scoring. First, they play at a slow tempo, typically in the mid-60s possessions per game, which already removes several scoring opportunities compared to an average college game. Second, they run a lot of half-court offense and frequently use most of the shot clock before taking a shot, which stretches possessions and lowers the total number of trips. Third, they rebound well defensively, limiting second-chance points and preventing opponents from generating extra possessions.

If St. Bonaventure dictates the pace here, the game likely lands around 66–68 possessions. Assuming roughly normal efficiency—about 1.05 points per possession for St. Bonaventure and around 0.98–1.00 for La Salle—the projection comes out around:

67 possessions × ~2.03 combined PPP ≈ 136–139 points.
Even allowing for a little variance or late fouling, that still keeps the expected range closer to the high-130s or very low-140s.

The earlier meeting between these teams finished higher, which likely helped keep this total elevated, but that game played more at La Salle’s preferred tempo. In a neutral-court conference tournament setting, games tend to tighten up, rotations shorten, and possessions get longer. Those conditions usually favor the slower team’s style, which in this matchup is St. Bonaventure.

If the Bonnies control tempo like they typically do, this game should settle into a methodical half-court pace.

Projected score:
St. Bonaventure 72
La Salle 67
Play: Under 145.5 (2X)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
133
Reaction score
71
2X PLAY — Providence vs Butler UNDER 162.5


This number opened extremely high at 166.5 and has been bet down to the low 160s, which already tells us sharp money showed up early on the under. Even after that move, the number still looks inflated when you break down the matchup and likely game script.


The first thing that stands out is the spread. Providence is only a small favorite around -1.5. When you get a game with a spread this tight and a total in the 160s, the math usually doesn’t line up. Close games tend to slow down in the second half because every possession matters, teams work deeper into the shot clock, and late possessions often turn into half-court sets rather than transition.


From a tempo standpoint, neither team plays at the type of pace that consistently produces totals in the mid-160s. A realistic possession range for this matchup is roughly mid-60s. Even if both teams score efficiently around 1.05–1.08 points per possession, that still projects closer to the mid-140s.


There’s also the conference tournament factor. These games typically tighten up defensively, rotations shorten, and teams emphasize execution over pace. That environment tends to suppress scoring compared to regular season matchups.


Put it together and a realistic outcome looks something like Providence in the low-70s and Butler right around 70. That puts the total in the mid-140s range, leaving plenty of room below the current number even accounting for some late fouling.


With the opening line correction, the tight spread, and the possession math all pointing the same direction, the under still looks like the right side here.


Play: Providence / Butler UNDER 162.5 (2X)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
133
Reaction score
71
SMU +6.5


This line looks a little inflated for a conference tournament game where the underdog has the ability to control tempo.


SMU tends to play at a pace that can keep games within striking distance, and when spreads sit in the 6–7 range in tournament settings, those extra possessions become very valuable for the dog. Fewer possessions generally make it harder for favorites to build separation.


Louisville may have the edge on paper, but this type of matchup often turns into a half-court game where scoring runs are limited. In those environments, spreads above two possessions can be difficult to cover unless the favorite shoots extremely well.


If the game lands around the mid-60s in possessions — which is a reasonable expectation — each possession becomes more valuable and variance favors the underdog. That makes the +6.5 attractive in what should be a competitive tournament game.


Projected range has Louisville winning a tight one somewhere around the mid-70s to high-60s.


Play: SMU +6.5 (1X)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
133
Reaction score
71
2x Play: Little Rock vs Richmond — Under 143.5

I’m stepping up to a 2x play on the under in the Little Rock vs Richmond matchup.

This game sets up as a clash of styles, but Richmond’s identity usually dictates the pace. The Spiders run one of the more deliberate half-court offenses in the country under Chris Mooney. They are comfortable running offense deep into the shot clock, prioritizing ball movement and shot quality rather than playing fast. Richmond also takes care of the ball well, which limits transition chances for the opponent.

That matters here because Little Rock’s offense tends to be much more effective when it can generate points in transition or early in the shot clock. Against a team like Richmond that values possession and limits turnovers, those easy scoring opportunities tend to disappear. When Little Rock is forced to operate primarily in the half court, their efficiency drops and possessions tend to lengthen.

From a tempo standpoint this matchup likely settles around 66–67 possessions, which is typical for Richmond games. Running a tempo + efficiency projection off that pace gives Richmond roughly 1.07 points per possession against Little Rock’s defense and Little Rock around 1.00–1.02 PPP against Richmond’s defense.

That produces a projected score in the neighborhood of:
Richmond 72
Little Rock 68
That lands the total around 140 points, a few points below the current number of 143.5.

The market movement also points in the same direction. While about 61% of bets are on the over, roughly 82% of the money is on the under, suggesting larger wagers are leaning that way. The total has also ticked down from the opener in the mid-140s, indicating early respected money pushed the number lower.
Add in the conference tournament environment, where teams tend to shorten rotations and emphasize defense, and this profiles as a more controlled game rather than a track meet.
Between Richmond’s ability to slow games down, the half-court matchup favoring longer possessions, and the tempo projection landing near 140, the under still looks like the right side.

2x Play: Under 143.5
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,139,247
Messages
13,884,225
Members
104,565
Latest member
desigaram78
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com